Critical Materials Atlas
Publications

Reports

Self-contained, dated, citable write-ups of the atlas’s core findings — each with its method, its caveats, and a downloadable version. Built on public data; meant to be checked.

Report 07 · Aug 2026 · Policy watch

The November 2026 cliff

China’s October-2025 export-control wave — expanded rare earths + the battery supply chain — was suspended for one year, to November 2026. A scheduled snap-back, not a resolution. Three years of controls land exactly where the mechanism map says the leverage is: by-product and built-capability chokepoints, never diffuse chains.

Read the report →The tracker →Chokepoint Map

Report 06 · Aug 2026 · Validation

Does a public-data risk index recover the IEA’s?

A falsification test survived: the atlas’s free, public-data supply-risk index independently recovers the IEA’s proprietary-data high-risk list — four of six discrete minerals in the top third. Convergence on the specifics; the only difference is a wider aperture.

Read the report →Interactive →Risk index

Report 05 · Aug 2026 · Synthesis

Chokepoints in motion: the mechanism predicts the trend

Concentration is not static — it moves, and the direction tracks the mechanism. Built-capability chokepoints erode (rare-earth refining 84→73% by 2035), policy and thermodynamic ones entrench. Tested against the IEA GCMO 2026 projections for six minerals.

Read the report →Interactive →Chokepoint Map

Report 01August 2026Decision

Breaking the chokepoint: from finding to decision

Knowing China refines what it doesn’t mine is only half an answer. This report turns the critical-material chokepoints into decisions: which kind of moat holds each one, who could realistically break it, whether the world could absorb a cut — and the counterintuitive result that for 8 of 31 materials, removing the leading exporter makes concentration worse.

Read the report →Print / PDFInteractive tools →

Report 02August 2026Finding

The origin gap: the refiner is not the source

In 17 of 32 critical materials the top exporter is not the top miner; in several, a country that mines under 5% of world supply exports more than a quarter of it. Import-origin statistics systematically misidentify where supply is concentrated — a measurement gap between reconciled trade and USGS mine production, stated precisely.

Read the report →Short formExplore the data →

Report 03August 2026Method

Does the product space predict the climb? An honest control

We tested whether economic-complexity density forecasts which countries acquire downstream capability. It looked strong (AUC ~0.86) — until the controls: density is 95–98% a country’s overall diversity, placebos like whisky score the same, and the residual collapses toward chance. A negative result, published because the discipline is the point.

Read the report →Interactive →Data

Report 04August 2026Synthesis

Why stages concentrate: a mechanism taxonomy from 58 value chains

Across 58 end-use chains, the bottleneck is rarely the mine — only 4 chokepoints are geological; the other 54 were made. This report sorts them by the mechanism that concentrates each binding stage — thermodynamic, by-product, built capability, geological, governance, policy, or none — so the concentration is predicted from the process, and each mechanism names its own fix.

Read the report →The Chokepoint Map →Value Chains

Permanently archived on Zenodo — concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21948855 (always resolves to the latest version). Each release also carries its own version DOI.